Public prosecutor’s competence questioned

By MATTHEW VARI

Sunday, January 11, 2015 (Sunday Chronicle, PNG)

LEADER of the Opposition Don Polye has questioned the Public Prosecutor, Pondros Kaluwin, in reference to his ability after the National Court granted an application by the Prime Minister Peter O’Neill staying the proceedings of the leadership tribunal appointed to inquire into allegations of misconduct by him, pending the determination of the issues before the Supreme Court.

“The court found that constitutional issues arise from the manner in which the public prosecutor Mr Kaluwin has handled the allegations referred to him by the Ombudsman Commission (OC),” Mr Polye said.

“I am making reference to the decision made by the National court yesterday (Thursday 8) as the leader of the opposition I am seriously concerned about the conduct of the public prosecutor.”

“Is the public Prosecutor certain that he has done the right thing? And is he still competent?”

“He sat on this issue since the 12 of August that are straight forward for two months and in early October 2014 asked the ombudsman for further evidence.”

He said that it took too long to make a decision, that there was more evidence needed until in December he requested the Chief Justice to appoint a leadership tribunal.

“Mr Kauwin’s conduct of allegations towards the PM has given rise to constitutional questions,” Polye said.

“Is it usual for such practices to be done by the Public Prosecutor? Had it not been for Mr Kaluwin the leadership Tribunal should have gone ahead to prosecute Mr O’Neill without further delay.”

“Is he competent to play the duties of a very important and independent duty and constitutional office of the Public Prosecutor?”

He added that the public wanted to see a decision made for an office that is highly regarded like the PM’s and the case be done swiftly.

Polye also questioned the use of private lawyers he said have been engage to the case also.