Caption: Registrar of Political Parties and Candidates Dr Alphonse
Gelu
By MATTHEW VARI
Sunday, June 8, 2014 (Sunday Chronicle, PNG)
REGISTRAR for Political
Parties and Candidates Dr Alphonse Gelu defended his office’s proposed changes
to the Organic Law on the Integrity of Political Parties and Candidates as one
that would be beneficial to everyone- in terms of maintaining stability on the
political front.
The registrar in an
interview made reference to clarify the report on the front page of Post
Courier June 5 edition, which drew attention to one of the six proposed
amendments- the amendment to section 145, which the paper claimed would benefit
the ruling People National Congress Party led by Prime Minister Peter O’Neill.
“We are proposing some new
amendments to the constitution on the integrity of political parties and
candidates,” Dr Gelu said.
“These are necessary in
order to make the revised OLIPPAC compliant to the Constitution after the Supreme
Court removed certain sections of the OLLIPAC it said that they were
unconstitutional in 2010, especially those parts that restricted the movement
of members who wanted to leave a party.”
“We are revising the
organic law, what has happened is that NEC has approved it and it has gone
through for printing.”
He referred to Post
Courier’s front page as an exaggeration on its part to zero in on section 145
without first clarifying with the registrar, yet making reference to him in the
report.
“What happened was that
the Post Courier sensationalised one aspect of the proposed amendments,” he
said.
“Just because his (Prime
Minister O’Neill) in government at the moment, it does not mean that we are
doing this amendment for him.”
“From the onset there is
nothing sinister about these proposed amendments to the constitution- these amendments were
put together by the team that the registry put together to revise the OLIPPAC,
and is not an agenda from the current O’Neill-Dion Government.”
He added that the changes
had been presented to all party officials since 2013 who were well informed in
various forums organised by the his office.
“We are looking at the
previous situations we have had in the past til now where governments were
being removed just like that- without any warning they could be removed,” Gelu
said.
“Because of that they were
not comfortable and were not doing anything good, at that time to the economic
environment suffered as a result of this.”
“We are trying to improve
it because of instability- and the organic law provided that, until that ruling
in the Supreme Court and we are now back to square one.”
“What we are proposing is
to set certain conditions for those who want to jump parties, there will be
certain processes that have to take place before they move.”
Dr Gelu pointed out that
the focus of the revision was on parties themselves.
“Since we cannot touch MPs
now we can focus on the Parties, to work with them to develop and help them,”
he said.
“When it comes to
discipline and those other things, the party constitutions will deal with that,
not us.”
“Any issues on
resignations will be dealt with by the party constitution, we are here just to
manage them and strengthen their existence.”
Proposed under section 145
is that in the event a vote of no confidence is successful to remove the Prime
Minister- he is removed but the next PM is to still come from the party that
was originally invited by the Governor General to form government.
“The reason for that is
that all the parties have been given equal opportunity to go to the elections,”
he explained.
“They campaign and are
successful because of their effort to gain the highest number of seats because
it reflects what the people want and they have earned the right to form
government, every party have been given the opportunity to achieve that.”
“In the event that the nominated
candidate fails a simple majority of the vote, then the Speaker shall advise
the head of state (Governor General) to invite any other candidates declared in
the elections to form government to form government after seven days from the
date of the vote.”
The other five proposed
amendments include;
- Freedom of assembly and association- section 47
- Voting in parliament- section 114
- Parliamentary privileges- section 115
- Amendments to subdivision H- Section 127
- Repeal and replace amendment 128
He
added that it will go through a one month period for comments from the public,
and will go through a committee who will consider the comments and if they want
to make changes where they can.
No comments:
Post a Comment